[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUb6sWo0MvgdOXYGBBfJqZ5QeUtQDDPVxGb70sZ6JyG4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:06:26 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 18 [ call-trace: drm | x86 | smp | rcu
related? ]
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Davidlohr pointed to this patch (tested the triplet):
>>
>> ipc, sem: do not call sem_lock when bogus sma:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/31/12
>>
>> Is that what you mean?
>
> Yup.
>
Davidlohr Bueso (1):
ipc, sem: do not call sem_lock when bogus sma
Linus Torvalds (1):
crazy rcu double free debug hack
With ***both*** patches applied I am able to build a Linux-kernel with
4 parallel-make-jobs again.
David's or your patch alone are not sufficient!
- Sedat -
> Linus
View attachment "dmesg_3.9.0-rc7-next20130419-12-iniza-small.txt" of type "text/plain" (53717 bytes)
Download attachment "3.9.0-rc7-next20130419-12-iniza-small.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5290 bytes)
Download attachment "config-3.9.0-rc7-next20130419-12-iniza-small" of type "application/octet-stream" (112372 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists