[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130421012925.GA19097@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:29:25 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:12:14AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > I want an assertion here.
>
> freezing codes is very simple for verifying.
I still want it (and your patch is removing it). The usual cases are
fine but things can get messy on edge cases like freeze failure, bugs
in freezer code itself or whatnot. Please keep the assertion.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists