[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130421224859.GC4593@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:48:59 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix AMD K6 indirect call check v2
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 03:35:41PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Looks like it is just trying to sense the bug... but then it doesn't
> actually do anything about it. At least it should taint the kernel.
Yeah, I was thinking of asking my old contacts about it but it is simply
not worth it. Those CPUs are on their way to the museum if they're not
there already.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists