[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1304211648150.21884@ionos>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Resume does not work after timekeeping change
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my machine does not wake from suspend to RAM on my box running the -next
> kernel. The last thing I see is "Disabling non-boot CPUs ...". I
> bisected it to this commit:
>
> commit 7ec98e15aa049b7a2ca73485f31cf4f90c34e2dd
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Thu Feb 21 22:51:39 2013 +0000
>
> timekeeping: Delay update of clock->cycle_last
>
>
> Reverting that one on the top of -next-20130419 makes it work again.
Does the patch below fix the issue?
Thanks,
tglx
---
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 675f720..98cd470 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts_delta);
/* Re-base the last cycle value */
- clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
+ tk->cycle_last = clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
tk->ntp_error = 0;
timekeeping_suspended = 0;
timekeeping_update(tk, false, true);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists