lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366563522.10770.1.camel@phoenix>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:58:42 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix off-by-one for ramp_delay and
 register value mapping

In probe(), we have below code to set ramp_delay:
e.g. When reg is 2, current code set
pmic->desc[id].ramp_delay = palmas_smps_ramp_delay[reg & 0x3];
                          = 5000
which means ramp_delay = 5000 is mapping to reg value = 2;

However, in palmas_smps_set_ramp_delay()
        ramp_delay = 5000 is mapping to reg value = 1.

This patch fixes the off-by-one value range checking for ramp_delay in
palmas_smps_set_ramp_delay().

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
Hi Laxman,
I don't have the datasheet, so please check if this fix is correct.

Thanks,
Axel
 drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
index 8fed60c..e3e8373 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
@@ -447,9 +447,9 @@ static int palmas_smps_set_ramp_delay(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 
 	if (ramp_delay <= 0)
 		reg = 0;
-	else if (ramp_delay < 2500)
+	else if (ramp_delay <= 2500)From 6f6875db93eeff52d39623dd68522e1875cf5ef1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:50:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix off-by-one for ramp_delay and register value mapping

In probe(), we have below code to set ramp_delay:
e.g. When reg is 2, current code set
pmic->desc[id].ramp_delay = palmas_smps_ramp_delay[reg & 0x3];
                          = 5000
which means ramp_delay = 5000 is mapping to reg value = 2;

However, in palmas_smps_set_ramp_delay()
        ramp_delay = 5000 is mapping to reg value = 1.

This patch fixes the off-by-one value range checking for ramp_delay in
palmas_smps_set_ramp_delay().

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
Hi Laxman,
I don't have the datasheet, so please check if this fix is correct.

Thanks,
Axel
 drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
index 8fed60c..e3e8373 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
@@ -447,9 +447,9 @@ static int palmas_smps_set_ramp_delay(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 
 	if (ramp_delay <= 0)
 		reg = 0;
-	else if (ramp_delay < 2500)
+	else if (ramp_delay <= 2500)
 		reg = 3;
-	else if (ramp_delay < 5000)
+	else if (ramp_delay <= 5000)
 		reg = 2;
 	else
 		reg = 1;
-- 
1.7.10.4


 		reg = 3;
-	else if (ramp_delay < 5000)
+	else if (ramp_delay <= 5000)
 		reg = 2;
 	else
 		reg = 1;
-- 
1.7.10.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ