[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130422080136.GA7080@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:01:36 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tiwai@...e.de, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: irq 16: nobody cared
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> From 3c155e9a22036839c09d98a4acbc7e17a5a3783c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:56:15 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] RCU: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume
>
> Paul says CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ can increase grace-period durations by a
> factor of four. This, in turn, can change timings during suspend and can
> delay interrupts handling, leading to "IRQ XX: nobody cared" splats and
> the machine disabling those interrupt lines for no sensible reason.
>
> Thus, we want to temporarily switch to expedited grace periods when
> suspending the box and return to normal settings when resuming. This
> patch does exactly that.
Hm, this really smells like a workaround: treating the symptom, not the
cause.
How can an increase in grace-periods break drivers and suspend? Do we
understand exactly what happens there? If we do, can we fix that instead
of tweaking the RCU timeouts?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists