linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Also report the number of logical channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130422094842.GL24632@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:18:42 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Also report the number of
 logical channels

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:14:55AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Now we know the total of physical and logical channels, we may as
> > > well report them within the information log.
> > > 
> > > Before:
> > > dma40 dma40.0: hardware revision: 3 @ 0x801c0000 with 8 physical channels
> > > 
> > > After:
> > > <as above ...> and 256 logical channels
> > > 
> > > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
> > > Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>
> > > Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c |    5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> > > index 282dd59..805049c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> > > @@ -3200,8 +3200,9 @@ static struct d40_base * __init d40_hw_detect_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  
> > >  	num_log_chans = num_phy_chans * D40_MAX_LOG_CHAN_PER_PHY;
> > >  
> > > -	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "hardware revision: %d @ 0x%x with %d physical channels\n",
> > > -		 rev, res->start, num_phy_chans);
> > > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "hardware revision: %d @ 0x%x with "
> > > +		"%d physical channels and %d logical channels\n",
> > > +		rev, res->start, num_phy_chans, num_log_chans);
> > Splitting log messages across lines is bad idea and sacrifces readablity... also
> > wasnt splitting logging to multiple lines emit checkpatch warn
> 
> You also get a check-patch error if your lines are over 80 chars.
No, you get a warn
> 
> How would you solve this?
Use common sense :) I would never sacrfice readablity of code. Erring on 80chars
is fine by me as long as it makes sense.

--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/