[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130422101949.GU24632@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:49:49 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply macros to resolve
'src' and 'dst' directions
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:27:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:11:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > There are lots of lengthy if() statements located sporadically up and
> > > down the driver. This simple macro should make many of them a little
> > > simpler to decipher. The remainder have to stay in place, as they
> > > detail slightly more specific settings.
> > I would like these to be DMAENGINE_IS_SRC...
>
> I don't understand, as they're DMA40 specific?
>
> > and this patch use the defines provided in dmaengine
>
> I think a subsequent patch doing he following would be more suitable:
>
> s/STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM/DMA_MEM_TO_MEM/
> s/STEDMA40_MEM_TO_PERIPH/DMA_MEM_TO_DEV/
> s/STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_MEM/DMA_DEV_TO_MEM/
> s/STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_PERIPH/DMA_DEV_TO_DEV/
>
> If you don't mind?
sounds like a good plan
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists