[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366631983.4443.11.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:59:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in
rebalance_domains()
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 15:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> @@ -5506,10 +5506,10 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum
> cpu_idle_type idle)
> if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd->last_balance +
> interval)) {
> if (load_balance(cpu, rq, sd, idle, &balance))
> {
> /*
> - * We've pulled tasks over so either
> we're no
> - * longer idle.
> + * We've pulled tasks over so either
> we may
> + * be no longer idle.
> */
That comment didn't make sense and it does even less now.
How about we make that:
/*
* The LBF_SOME_PINNED logic could have changed
* env->dst_cpu, so we can't know our idle state
* even if we migrated tasks; update it.
*/
> - idle = CPU_NOT_IDLE;
> + idle = idle_cpu(cpu) ? CPU_IDLE :
> CPU_NOT_IDLE;
> }
> sd->last_balance = jiffies;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists