[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304221404.31281.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:04:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König"
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for ARMv7-M's NVIC
On Monday 22 April 2013, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (for the new readers of this thread: This is about using
>
> u32 mask = 1 << (d->hwirq % 32);
>
> instead of
>
> u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq - gc->irq_base);
While not technically any different, I would suggest writing the above
as (d->hwirq & 0x1f), which makes it clear to the reader that this is
intended to be a cheap bit mask operation rather than an expensive
division.
>
> arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/common.c
> -> uses irq_base=101 for irq_alloc_generic_chip
I think there are plans to replace this code with
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c, but I don't know if patches
exist already.
> arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c
> -> depends on how orion_gpio_of_init is called. No callers
> found.
As of f9e7592230b, this code has been replaced with a pinctrl driver
and can be killed.
> arch/arm/plat-orion/irq.c
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/irq-vic-timer.c
> -> used for a single irq that isn't a multiple of 32
Tomasz Figa has a patch set to remove this file, will likely get merged
in 3.11.
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/s5p-irq-gpioint.c
> -> would need % 8?
AFAICT this code is the same driver as arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/common.c
and will meet the same fate.
> arch/sh/boards/mach-se/7343/irq.c
> -> uses irq_base = irq_linear_revmap(se7343_irq_domain, 0) where
> se7343_irq_domain is a linear domain.
> AFAICT this is a bug. (After adding the domain they map all irqs
> in increasing order which currently seems to guarantee that it
> works. But IMHO it should use a legacy domain.)
>
> arch/sh/boards/mach-se/7722/irq.c
> as above.
Right. I think irq_domain_add_simple() is the right interface to use
here.
> For the uncommented files using %32 instead of -gc->irq_base should
> work.
I'm not sure I understand why this doesn't work for the ones that use
a base that isn't a multiple of 32. Since you are masking the hwirq
rather than the irq number, it will still be zero-based, won't it?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists