linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 5/5] arm: omap2+: omap_device: remove no_idle_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <517545C2.3080006@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:14:26 +0300
From:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:	Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>
CC:	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>, <khilman@...aro.org>,
	<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Rajendra nayak <rnayak@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 5/5] arm: omap2+: omap_device: remove no_idle_on_suspend

On 04/22/2013 04:43 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> Remove the "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND" check, since
> driver should be able to prevent idling of an omap device
> whenever required.
>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> Cc: Rajendra nayak <rnayak@...com>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>
> ---
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I have put this as an RFC, due to few comments on cover letter of
> the previous version by Grygorii Strashko.
> As, he has mentioned that there are Audio playback use cases which
> also requires "no_idle_on_suspend" and using them on mainline after
> this series can cause regression.
>
> What you think will be the right approach on this in relation to this patch?
> I mean every driver(if possible) should  prevent
> runtime PM for no_idle_on_suspend usecase and we get
> rid of this OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND check? OR we should
> drop this patch as of now?
>
> Hi Grygorii,
>
> Is it possible to handle ABE no_idle_on_suspend uscase the way I am
> trying to handle it for UART in the 2nd patch of this series?
Unfortunately, I don't know ASOC details (my part is PM),  but from the 
first look it
will be not easy, because map4-dmic have no Runtime PM handlers at all, 
for example ((
>
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c |   12 +++---------
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.h |   10 ----------
>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> index 381be7a..2043d71 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> @@ -170,9 +170,6 @@ static int omap_device_build_from_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   			r->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (of_get_property(node, "ti,no_idle_on_suspend", NULL))
> -		omap_device_disable_idle_on_suspend(pdev);
> -
>   	pdev->dev.pm_domain = &omap_device_pm_domain;
>   
>   odbfd_exit1:
> @@ -620,11 +617,9 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>   	ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
>   
>   	if (!ret && !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> -		if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) {
> -			if (!(od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND))
> -				omap_device_idle(pdev);
> +		if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0)
> +			omap_device_idle(pdev);
>   			od->flags |= OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
> -		}
>   	}
>   
>   	return ret;
> @@ -638,8 +633,7 @@ static int _od_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>   	if ((od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) &&
>   	    !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
>   		od->flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
> -		if (!(od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND))
> -			omap_device_enable(pdev);
> +		omap_device_enable(pdev);
>   		pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
>   	}
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.h
> index 044c31d..17ca1ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ extern struct dev_pm_domain omap_device_pm_domain;
>   
>   /* omap_device.flags values */
>   #define OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED		BIT(0)
> -#define OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND	BIT(1)
>   
>   /**
>    * struct omap_device - omap_device wrapper for platform_devices
> @@ -101,13 +100,4 @@ static inline struct omap_device *to_omap_device(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	return pdev ? pdev->archdata.od : NULL;
>   }
> -
> -static inline
> -void omap_device_disable_idle_on_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> -	struct omap_device *od = to_omap_device(pdev);
> -
> -	od->flags |= OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND;
> -}
> -
>   #endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/