linux-kernel - [46/75] can: sja1000: fix handling on dt properties on little endian systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1366640759.637713788@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:25:59 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Christoph Fritz" <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [46/75] can: sja1000: fix handling on dt properties on little
 endian systems

3.2.44-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>

commit 0443de5fbf224abf41f688d8487b0c307dc5a4b4 upstream.

To get correct endianes on little endian cpus (like arm) while reading device
tree properties, this patch replaces of_get_property() with
of_property_read_u32(). While there use of_property_read_bool() for the
handling of the boolean "nxp,no-comparator-bypass" property.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c |   31 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ static int __devinit sja1000_ofp_probe(s
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct sja1000_priv *priv;
 	struct resource res;
-	const u32 *prop;
-	int err, irq, res_size, prop_size;
+	u32 prop;
+	int err, irq, res_size;
 	void __iomem *base;
 
 	err = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
@@ -136,27 +136,27 @@ static int __devinit sja1000_ofp_probe(s
 	priv->read_reg = sja1000_ofp_read_reg;
 	priv->write_reg = sja1000_ofp_write_reg;
 
-	prop = of_get_property(np, "nxp,external-clock-frequency", &prop_size);
-	if (prop && (prop_size ==  sizeof(u32)))
-		priv->can.clock.freq = *prop / 2;
+	err = of_property_read_u32(np, "nxp,external-clock-frequency", &prop);
+	if (!err)
+		priv->can.clock.freq = prop / 2;
 	else
 		priv->can.clock.freq = SJA1000_OFP_CAN_CLOCK; /* default */
 
-	prop = of_get_property(np, "nxp,tx-output-mode", &prop_size);
-	if (prop && (prop_size == sizeof(u32)))
-		priv->ocr |= *prop & OCR_MODE_MASK;
+	err = of_property_read_u32(np, "nxp,tx-output-mode", &prop);
+	if (!err)
+		priv->ocr |= prop & OCR_MODE_MASK;
 	else
 		priv->ocr |= OCR_MODE_NORMAL; /* default */
 
-	prop = of_get_property(np, "nxp,tx-output-config", &prop_size);
-	if (prop && (prop_size == sizeof(u32)))
-		priv->ocr |= (*prop << OCR_TX_SHIFT) & OCR_TX_MASK;
+	err = of_property_read_u32(np, "nxp,tx-output-config", &prop);
+	if (!err)
+		priv->ocr |= (prop << OCR_TX_SHIFT) & OCR_TX_MASK;
 	else
 		priv->ocr |= OCR_TX0_PULLDOWN; /* default */
 
-	prop = of_get_property(np, "nxp,clock-out-frequency", &prop_size);
-	if (prop && (prop_size == sizeof(u32)) && *prop) {
-		u32 divider = priv->can.clock.freq * 2 / *prop;
+	err = of_property_read_u32(np, "nxp,clock-out-frequency", &prop);
+	if (!err && prop) {
+		u32 divider = priv->can.clock.freq * 2 / prop;
 
 		if (divider > 1)
 			priv->cdr |= divider / 2 - 1;
@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int __devinit sja1000_ofp_probe(s
 		priv->cdr |= CDR_CLK_OFF; /* default */
 	}
 
-	prop = of_get_property(np, "nxp,no-comparator-bypass", NULL);
-	if (!prop)
+	if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "nxp,no-comparator-bypass"))
 		priv->cdr |= CDR_CBP; /* default */
 
 	priv->irq_flags = IRQF_SHARED;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/