[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130422150710.GA30858@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:07:10 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: add ability to get/set signal-blocked mask
On 04/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 04/22, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> >
> > + case PTRACE_SETSIGMASK:
> > + {
> > + sigset_t new_set;
> > +
> > + if (addr != sizeof(sigset_t)) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&new_set, datavp, sizeof(sigset_t))) {
> > + ret = -EFAULT;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sigdelsetmask(&new_set, sigmask(SIGKILL)|sigmask(SIGSTOP));
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
> > + __set_task_blocked(child, &new_set);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
>
> No, please don't...
>
> set_current_blocked/__set_task_blocked assume that tsk == current.
> If nothing else, note recalc_sigpending() in __set_task_blocked().
>
> I don't understand "This method is not suitable for stopped tasks"
> from the changelog, but if you really need PTRACE_SETSIGMASK just
> change ->blocked under siglock and do recalc_sigpending_tsk(child).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
actually this is not necessary, the tracee will do recalc_sigpending()
after resume. But perhaps a comment make sense.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists