linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130422153408.GD3791@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:34:08 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2

Hi Stephen,

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
> arm64 compiler.
> 
> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
> at the same time.
> 
> Stephen Boyd (4):
>   ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
>   ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
>   ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
>   ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
> 
>  arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h |   5 +-
>  arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c       |  14 +----
>  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c      | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
this series was based on.

What do I need to use as the base for this series?

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/