linux-kernel - [RFC/PATCH 4/4] s390: Provide default implementation for dma_{alloc,free}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1366607431-3156-1-git-send-email-dhobsong@igel.co.jp>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:10:31 +0900
From:	Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 4/4] s390: Provide default implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs

Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA, have implementations for
both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs().  All achitectures that do
not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by
dma-mapping-broken.h.

Add default implementations for these functions on s390.

Signed-off-by: Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index 9411db65..91f7312 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ static inline int dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
 	return (dma_addr == 0UL);
 }
 
+#define dma_alloc_attrs(d, s, h, f, a) dma_alloc_coherent(d, s, h, f)
+#define dma_free_attrs(d, s, h, f, a) dma_free_coherent(d, s, h, f)
+
 static inline void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 				       dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag)
 {
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/