lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:48:39 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Taras Kondratiuk <taras@...com>
Cc:	lgirdwood@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	shawn.guo@...aro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@...dia.com>,
	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Add regulator_set_voltage_min()

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:49:37PM +0300, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:

> Yeah. Sure 4kV is not a real request, but
> max will be limited by system constrains.
> According to regulator_set_voltage() documentation
> system constraints should be set before calling this function,
> so I assume I can rely on them. No?

> Another possible implementation is below, but prefer initial one.

I just don't see any reason for this API.  The driver setting the
voltage ought to have some idea of what the chip limits are too for
safety.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ