[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5175E80A.7030908@asianux.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:46:50 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/audit_tree.c: tree will memory leak when failure
occurs for audit_trim_trees()
On 2013年04月23日 07:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:39:06 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> in audit_trim_trees(), has called get_tree() before failure occurs,
>> so need also call put_tree after go to skip_it:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
>> @@ -617,10 +617,10 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>> trim_marked(tree);
>> - put_tree(tree);
>> drop_collected_mounts(root_mnt);
>> skip_it:
>> mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>> + put_tree(tree);
>> }
>> list_del(&cursor);
>> mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>
> That looks right to me.
>
> I think we can micro-optimise the code by performing the put_tree()
> before taking the mutex, to slightly reduce mutex hold times?
>
ok, thanks.
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c~kernel-audit_treec-tree-will-leak-memory-when-failure-occurs-in-audit_trim_trees-fix
> +++ a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -619,8 +619,8 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)
> trim_marked(tree);
> drop_collected_mounts(root_mnt);
> skip_it:
> - mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> put_tree(tree);
> + mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> }
> list_del(&cursor);
> mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> _
>
>
>
>
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists