linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ptrace: add ability to get/set signal-blocked mask (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130423152143.GA30125@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:21:43 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: add ability to get/set signal-blocked mask (v2)

On 04/23, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> @@ -841,6 +841,48 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request,
>  			ret = ptrace_setsiginfo(child, &siginfo);
>  		break;
>  
> +	case PTRACE_GETSIGMASK:
> +		if (addr != sizeof(sigset_t)) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (copy_to_user(datavp, &child->blocked, sizeof(sigset_t)))
> +			ret = -EFAULT;

Yes, we can do this lockless. Only the task itself (or the debugger with
this patch) can change ->blocked, and the tracee can't run.

> +	case PTRACE_SETSIGMASK:
> +	{
> +		sigset_t new_set;
> +
> +		if (addr != sizeof(sigset_t)) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(&new_set, datavp, sizeof(sigset_t))) {
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		sigdelsetmask(&new_set, sigmask(SIGKILL)|sigmask(SIGSTOP));
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Every thread does recalc_sigpending() after resume, so
> +		 * retarget_shared_pending() and recalc_sigpending() are not
> +		 * called here.
> +		 */
> +		spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
> +		child->blocked = new_set;
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
> +
> +		ret = 0;
> +		break;
> +	}

And this looks fine too.

Personally I am not sure we need to check addr == sizeof(), debugger
should know what it does... But I won't argue.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/