[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130423155212.GI31170@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:52:12 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unsigned widening casts of binary "not" operations..
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:42:49AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The best case is for code that does bitmasking ops like this to avoid
> any casts (implicit or explicit) by just avoiding mixed types. That
> was, to a large degree, my hope for the sparse patch, but it's
> nontrivial. Many types are rather "natural" (ie constants have a
> natural "int" type, sizeof() is size_t, etc) and in other cases you
> want to do the same ops for two different types (with the case that
> caused me to start to look at it being the "align to page boundary"
> for a virtual address vs a PAE phys_addr_t) so you can't really avoid
> mixing things in some circumstances.
Maybe it's worth creating a magic helper function, called something
like mask_out() that handles the casting automatically, and it makes
it clear to a reader what you're trying to do?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists