[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLF16Edznsdis4NK-O1Sf=3Eswb5L=cfBDhjpr6F7UjTbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:19:37 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tools: Introduce new 'ftrace' command
Hello,
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:30 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> This patchset implements a front-end tool for kernel's ftrace. It
>> uses function_graph tracer by default and normal function tracer is
>> also supported. (Of course you need to enable those tracers in your
>> kernel first.)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Very nice Namhyung, thanks for doing this. I did a quick run through of
> the patches and I have no complaints about them. I'm not sure how the
> others will feel about it.
I also skimmed through the patches and they look like a reasonable
starting point. So FWIW,
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Are there any plans in trying to consolidate 'perf trace' and this? As
a user I don't really care what the underlying mechanism and would
like things to just work out of the box.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists