[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304232102.20573.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:02:20 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] usb: phy: tegra: don't call into tegra-ehci directly
On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > @@ -733,7 +731,9 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > tegra->phy = tegra_usb_phy_open(&pdev->dev, instance, hcd->regs,
> > pdata->phy_config,
> > - TEGRA_USB_PHY_MODE_HOST);
> > + TEGRA_USB_PHY_MODE_HOST,
> > + &tegra_ehci_set_pts,
> > + tegra_ehci_set_phcd);
>
> Does the compiler warn about the unnecessary '&'?
No, AFAIK, both variants are equally acceptable C.
> In any case, it
> looks strange to have one function pointer with an '&' and another
> without.
Yes, that was certainly not intentional. I've removed the '&' now.
> Aside from that minor detail, the ehci-tegra.c changes are fine.
Ok, thanks for the feedback.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists