[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304232146.20011.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:46:19 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: balbi@...com
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: phy: don't mark usb_bind_phy as __init
On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:07:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > It makes no sense for a symbol to be both exported and marked __init,
> > because any users in modules would be calling this function after
> > it gets discarded. Further, this patch revolves a section mismatch
> > warning from usbhs_init_phys(), which is intentionally not marked
> > __init:
> >
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x413f8): Section mismatch in reference from
> > the function usbhs_init_phys() to the function .init.text:usb_bind_phy()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >
> > v2: rebased on linux-next
>
> not needed, Greg already has a patch doing exactly this in usb-next.
Right, I see it now. I had checked today's linux-next but not usb-next
or any of the other trees for stuff that was just applied today.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists