| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAK9yfHw1o8+zunwK-NbMsbGdgOmpo8qGk8YjjiTLCsj0BhZehw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:13:26 +0530 From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: hjk@...sjkoch.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: uio: Fix UIO device registration failure On 26 March 2013 07:17, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:31:22AM +0900, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote: >> Until recently uio_get_minor() returned 0 for success and >> a negative value on failure. This became non-negative for suceess and >> negative for failure. Restore the original return value spec so that we can >> successfully initialize UIO devices with a non-zero minor device >> number. >> >> Signed-off-by: Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp> >> --- >> drivers/uio/uio.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Hans, don't you have a bunch of uio patches queued up for me? I've been > ignoring them, thinking you are collecting them, is this not true? Greg, there isn't any response from Hans regarding the UIO patches. Would you be picking them instead? -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists