[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51761375.5040509@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:22:05 +0530
From: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>, <khilman@...aro.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] driver: serial: omap: prevent runtime PM for "no_console_suspend"
Hi Felipe,
On Monday 22 April 2013 08:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:13:54PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>> The driver manages "no_console_suspend" by preventing runtime PM
>> during the suspend path, which forces the console UART to stay awake.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
>> index 08332f3..640b14e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
>> @@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ static int serial_omap_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> struct uart_omap_port *up = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct omap_uart_port_info *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>>
>> - if (!up)
>> + if (!up || (!console_suspend_enabled&& uart_console(&up->port)))
>> return -EINVAL;
> -EBUSY would be a better value for uart_console case, so this check
> should be splitted accordingly. Likewise on second hunk.
>
Ok. Will change in the next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists