[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366696969.28314.3.camel@phoenix>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:02:49 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>,
Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH RFT 2/2] pwm: lpc32xx: Don't change PWM_ENABLE bit
in lpc32xx_pwm_config
lpc32xx_pwm_config() is supposed to set duty_ns and period_ns,
it should not change PWM_ENABLE bit.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
index 1a5075e..e936202 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct lpc32xx_pwm_chip *lpc32xx = to_lpc32xx_pwm_chip(chip);
unsigned long long c;
int period_cycles, duty_cycles;
+ u32 val;
c = clk_get_rate(lpc32xx->clk) / 256;
c = c * period_ns;
@@ -68,8 +69,10 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
c = 255;
duty_cycles = 256 - c;
- writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles),
- lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
+ val = readl(lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
+ val &= ~0xFFFF;
+ val |= PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles);
+ writel(val, lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists