[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130424165417.5e2b74a01728d307e454750f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:54:17 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c between commit 554c06ba3ee2 ("cpuidle:
remove en_core_tk_irqen flag") from the pm tree and commit 2eb89f893e44
("ARM: EXYNOS: factor out the idle states") from the arm-soc tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
index 498a7a2,e2689d1..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
@@@ -58,6 -46,20 +46,19 @@@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_de
static struct cpuidle_driver exynos4_idle_driver = {
.name = "exynos4_idle",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .en_core_tk_irqen = 1,
+ .states = {
+ [0] = ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE,
+ [1] = {
+ .enter = exynos4_enter_lowpower,
+ .exit_latency = 300,
+ .target_residency = 100000,
+ .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
+ .name = "C1",
+ .desc = "ARM power down",
+ },
+ },
+ .state_count = 2,
+ .safe_state_index = 0,
};
/* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists