lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5177BF67.2040308@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:17:59 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Fix a build warning

On 24/04/13 11:56, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> 
>> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>>
>> Fix this:
>>
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c: In function ???setup_efi_vars???:
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c:269:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ???efi_call_phys??? makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
>> In file included from arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c:12:0:
>> /w/kernel/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h:8:33: note: expected ???void *??? but argument is of type ???long unsigned int???
>>
>> after cc5a080c5d40 ("efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime
>> code").
>>
>> Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
>> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
>> index 8615f7581820..41de115a55b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
>> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static efi_status_t setup_efi_vars(struct boot_params *params)
>>  	while (data && data->next)
>>  		data = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)data->next;
>>  
>> -	status = efi_call_phys4(sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info,
>> +	status = efi_call_phys4((void *)sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info,
>>  				EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE |
>>  				EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
>>  				EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS, &store_size,
> 
> Why isn't the query_variale_info field changed to void * instead? That way 
> no cast would be needed.

We could either change all fields in efi_system_table or the
efi_call_phys* prototypes. x86-64 already casts to (void *) when calling
efi_call0(), etc, though I'm not entirely sure why void * is needed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ