linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and actually used space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1366809836.23707.331.camel@linux-s257.site>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:23:56 +0800
From:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc:	"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] efi: Distinguish between "remaining space" and
 actually used space

於 三，2013-04-24 於 11:57 +0000，Matthew Garrett 提到：
> On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 18:59 +0800, joeyli wrote:
> 
> > Then why we don't just remove the "remaining_size" condition but only
> > monitor the active_size should not larger then 1/2 storage_size?
> 
> If we calculate active_size as using more than 50% of the storage space
> but remaining_size says we still have more than 50% available, we should
> trust remaining_size instead of active_size.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org

That makes sense because BIOS base on remaining_size to trigger garbage
collection.

Thanks for your clarification!

Joey Lee


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/