linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/10] usb: musb: ux500: harden checks for platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201304241656.53432.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:56:53 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	balbi@...com, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	mian.yousaf.kaukab@...ricsson.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] usb: musb: ux500: harden checks for platform data

On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> Yeah, I agree, although does it make a difference?
> 
> Is it evaluated a second time, or does it take up extra cycles by being
> enclosed in parentheses?
> 
> Or is this just a coding style thing?

Just coding style. I agree you should have no parentheses there, but it
does not change the compiled code.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/