linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/23] 3.0.75-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1366820506.2842.10.camel@lorien>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:21:46 +0000
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/23] 3.0.75-stable review

On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 14:56 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.75 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Apr 25 21:54:13 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.75-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------

Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.74, 3.4.41, and 3.8.8 

Reviewing patches - will let you know anything odd.

Compiled and booted on the following systems:

Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the
previous dmesgs for each of these releases.

Cross-compile tests results:

alpha: defconfig passed on all
arm: defconfig passed on all
arm64: not applicable to 3.0.y, 3.4.y. defconfig passed on 3.8.y
c6x: not applicable to 3.0.y, defconfig passed on 3.4.y, and 3.8.y.
mips: defconfig passed on all
mipsel: defconfig passed on all
powerpc: wii_defconfig passed on all
sh: defconfig passed on all 
sparc: defconfig passed on all
tile: tilegx_defconfig passed on all

Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5:
Note: Screaming fast system with ssd!! There are some vga issues on
3.0.74 and 3.0.75-rc1 on this system and I am going to investigate those
and see what's going on. No problems with 3.4 and 3.8. My current guess
is that 3.5 is the minimum for this system.

thanks,
-- Shuah