linux-kernel - Re: [PREEMPT RT] SLUB and split softirq lock for v3.2-rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:36:19 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT RT] SLUB and split softirq lock for v3.2-rt

On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features
> from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation.
> 
> SLUB has a way better performance than SLAB on RT and the split
> softirq lock implementation is necessary especially for realtime
> networking applications.
> 
> The following patch series backports these features to 3.2-rt.
> 
> Steven, could you please apply these patches to a separate
> 3.2-rt-features branch?
> 

Hi Sebastian,

Which version of 3.2-rt was this applied to. It does not apply, where
patch 7/16 totally does not apply. I looked at the history of 3.2-rt and
I can't find where it would apply.

Thanks,

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/