[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130424175304.GA701@oc0268524204.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:53:04 -0300
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the
infiniband tree
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c between commit 5b0c275926b8
> ("RDMA/cxgb4: Fix SQ allocation when on-chip SQ is disabled") from the
> infiniband tree and commit 9919d5bd01b9 ("RDMA/cxgb4: Fix onchip queue
> support for T5") from the net-next tree.
>
> I think that they are 2 different fixes for the same problem, so I just
> used the net-next version and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Commit 5b0c275926b8 also keeps the intention of the original patch which
broke it, which was to return an error code, in case the allocation fails.
Commit 9919d5bd01b9 fix will return 0 in case the allocation fails.
We should keep the other fix or fix the code again to return the proper
error code.
Regards.
Cascardo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists