Message-ID: <x49ppxjeofa.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:09:13 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Excessive stall times on ext4 in 3.9-rc2

Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> writes:

>> I'll also note that even though your I/O is going all over the place
>> (D2C is pretty bad, 14ms), most of the time is spent waiting for a
>> struct request allocation or between Queue and Merge:
>> 
>> ==================== All Devices ====================
>> 
>>             ALL           MIN           AVG           MAX           N
>> --------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -----------
>> 
>> Q2Q               0.000000001   0.000992259   8.898375882     2300861
>> Q2G               0.000000843  10.193261239 2064.079501935     1016463 <====
>
> This is not normally my sandbox so do you mind spelling this out?
>
> IIUC, the time to allocate the struct request from the slab cache is just a
> small portion of this time. The bulk of the time is spent in get_request()
> waiting for congestion to clear on the request list for either the sync or
> async queue. Once a process goes to sleep on that waitqueue, it has to wait
> until enough requests on that queue have been serviced before it gets woken
> again at which point it gets priority access to prevent further starvation.
> This is the Queue To Get Reqiest (Q2G) delay. What we may be seeing here
> is that the async queue was congested and on average, we are waiting for
> 10 seconds for it to clear. The maximum value may be bogus for reasons
> explained later.
>
> Is that accurate?

Yes, without getting into excruciating detail.

>> G2I               0.000000461   0.000044702   3.237065090     1015803
>> Q2M               0.000000101   8.203147238 2064.079367557     1311662
>> I2D               0.000002012   1.476824812 2064.089774419     1014890
>> M2D               0.000003283   6.994306138 283.573348664     1284872
>> D2C               0.000061889   0.014438316   0.857811758     2291996
>> Q2C               0.000072284  13.363007244 2064.092228625     2292191
>> 
>> ==================== Device Overhead ====================
>> 
>>        DEV |       Q2G       G2I       Q2M       I2D       D2C
>> ---------- | --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
>>  (  8,  0) |  33.8259%   0.0001%  35.1275%   4.8932%   0.1080%
>> ---------- | --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
>>    Overall |  33.8259%   0.0001%  35.1275%   4.8932%   0.1080%
>> 
>> I'm not sure I believe that max value.  2064 seconds seems a bit high.
>
> It is so I looked closer at the timestamps and there is an one hour
> correction about 4400 seconds into the test.  Daylight savings time kicked
> in on March 31st and the machine is rarely rebooted until this test case
> came along. It looks like there is a timezone or time misconfiguration
> on the laptop that starts the machine with the wrong time. NTP must have
> corrected the time which skewed the readings in that window severely :(

Not sure I'm buying that argument, as there are no gaps in the blkparse
output.  The logging is not done using wallclock time.  I still haven't
had sufficient time to dig into these numbers.

>> Also, Q2M should not be anywhere near that big, so more investigation is
>> required there.  A quick look over the data doesn't show any such delays
>> (making me question the tools), but I'll write some code tomorrow to
>> verify the btt output.
>> 
>
> It might be a single set of readings during a time correction that
> screwed it.

Again, I don't think so.

> I can reproduce it at will. Due to the nature of the test, the test
> results are variable and unfortunately it is one of the tricker mmtest
> configurations to setup.
>
> 1. Get access to a webserver
> 2. Close mmtests to your test machine
>    git clone https://github.com/gormanm/mmtests.git
> 3. Edit shellpacks/common-config.sh and set WEBROOT to a webserver path
> 4. Create a tar.gz of a large git tree and place it at $WEBROOT/linux-2.6.tar.gz
>    Alternatively place a compressed git tree anywhere and edit
>    configs/config-global-dhp__io-multiple-source-latency
>    and update GITCHECKOUT_SOURCETAR
> 5. Create a tar.gz of a large maildir directory and place it at
>    $WEBROOT/$WEBROOT/maildir.tar.gz
>    Alternatively, use an existing maildir folder and set
>    MONITOR_INBOX_OPEN_MAILDIR in
>    configs/config-global-dhp__io-multiple-source-latency
>
> It's awkward but it's not like there are standard benchmarks lying around
> and it seemed the best way to reproduce the problems I typically see early
> in the lifetime of a system or when running a git checkout when the tree
> has not been used in a few hours. Run the actual test with
>
> ./run-mmtests.sh --config configs/config-global-dhp__io-multiple-source-latency --run-monitor test-name-of-your-choice
>
> Results will be in work/log. You'll need to run this as root so it
> can run blktrace and so it can drop_caches between git checkouts
> (to force disk IO). If systemtap craps out on you, then edit
> configs/config-global-dhp__io-multiple-source-latency and remove dstate
> from MONITORS_GZIP

And how do I determine whether I've hit the problem?

> If you have trouble getting this running, ping me on IRC.

Yes, I'm having issues getting things to go, but you didn't provide me a
time zone, an irc server or a nick to help me find you.  Was that
intentional?  ;-)

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists