[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51784DF9.7010302@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:26:17 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Revert ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK compile time
optimizaitons
On 04/24/2013 12:44 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:32 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Kay Sievers noted that the ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK config,
>> which enables some minor compile time optimization to avoid
>> uncessary code in mostly the suspend/resume path could cause
>> problems for userland.
>>
>> In particular, the dependency for RTC_HCTOSYS on
>> !ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK, which avoids setting the time
>> twice and simplifies suspend/resume, has the side effect
>> of causing the /sys/class/rtc/rtcN/hctosys flag to always be
>> zero, and this flag is commonly used by udev to setup the
>> /dev/rtc symlink to /dev/rtcN, which can cause pain for
>> older applications.
> An alternative to reverting this could be to set that flag
> unconditionally on the rtc that matches the persistent clock the
> kernel uses internally?
>
> I mean regardless of the pretty weird config option
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE, which internally just does a strcmp() with
> the given device name when the flag is queried. :)
>
> Can't we just have the same interface and your original optimization
> on x86, even without CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE enabled at all?
This might be possible, but I'd rather it be part of the unification
work w/ the persistent_clock and the RTC code, rather then a quick hack.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists