lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:19:32 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS lost on x86 with ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
 changes?

On 04/23/2013 08:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:43 AM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 04/23/2013 06:34 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> what's the intention of:
>>>     e90c83f757fffdacec8b3c5eee5617dcc038338f ?
>>>     x86: Select HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK on x86
>>>
>>> It unconditionally sets:
>>>     HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
>>> but:
>>>     RTC_SYSTOHC
>>> got a depends on !HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
>>>
>>> This makes it impossible to sync the system time from the RTC on x86.
>>> What's going on here?
>>
>> So I suspect just some confusion, but let me know if thats wrong and you're
>> actually seeing an issue.
>>
>> SYSTOHC is what *sets the RTC* to the system time when we're synced with
>> NTP.
>>
>> HCTOSYS is what sets the system time from the RTC.
> Right, and RTC_HCTOSYS is not NTP related. It just reads the time from
> the RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE at bootup so we do not boot in 1970 time mode.
> We need that it in all cases, at every bootup on x86. But it's no
> longer there with the above commits. :)
On x86 the persistent_clock() is backed by the 
CMOS/EFI/kvm-wall/xen/vrtc clock (all via x86_platform.get_wallclock) 
should be present and we'll initialize the time in timekeeping_init() there.

Its only systems where there isn't a persistent_clock is where the RTC 
layer and the HCTOSYS is helpful.

Again, if you're having a problem where an x86 system isn't getting its 
time initialized correctly, please let me know the details of the system.

thanks
-john



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ