[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51774F44.2060704@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:19:32 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS lost on x86 with ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
changes?
On 04/23/2013 08:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:43 AM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 04/23/2013 06:34 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> what's the intention of:
>>> e90c83f757fffdacec8b3c5eee5617dcc038338f ?
>>> x86: Select HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK on x86
>>>
>>> It unconditionally sets:
>>> HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
>>> but:
>>> RTC_SYSTOHC
>>> got a depends on !HAS_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
>>>
>>> This makes it impossible to sync the system time from the RTC on x86.
>>> What's going on here?
>>
>> So I suspect just some confusion, but let me know if thats wrong and you're
>> actually seeing an issue.
>>
>> SYSTOHC is what *sets the RTC* to the system time when we're synced with
>> NTP.
>>
>> HCTOSYS is what sets the system time from the RTC.
> Right, and RTC_HCTOSYS is not NTP related. It just reads the time from
> the RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE at bootup so we do not boot in 1970 time mode.
> We need that it in all cases, at every bootup on x86. But it's no
> longer there with the above commits. :)
On x86 the persistent_clock() is backed by the
CMOS/EFI/kvm-wall/xen/vrtc clock (all via x86_platform.get_wallclock)
should be present and we'll initialize the time in timekeeping_init() there.
Its only systems where there isn't a persistent_clock is where the RTC
layer and the HCTOSYS is helpful.
Again, if you're having a problem where an x86 system isn't getting its
time initialized correctly, please let me know the details of the system.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists