linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uio/aec: specify correct license in MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:25:11 +0200
From:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio/aec: specify correct license in MODULE_LICENSE

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> The file header declares the code to be covered by GPL v2 only, so use
> explicit v2 for MODULE_LICENSE, too.

Doesn't this apply to almost any driver?
I don't understand why you explicitly "fix" this one.

--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/