| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201304251036.52284.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:36:52 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>, Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Amalgamate DMA source and destination channel numbers On Thursday 25 April 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > Are we now sacrificing that ability on the altar of simplification? > > I actually think not, but that we should do periph-to-periph transfers > in some other way, and that the .dir attribute should go away from > the struct stedma40_chan_cfg as well but I'm not entirely sure. > Someone else? The dma-engine core has no support for device-to-device transfers, and as far as I understand that is neither considered a useful feature in real life, nor easy to add, so I don't think it matters much here. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists