[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130425090147.GD12848@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:01:47 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] ARM: 7690/1: mm: fix CONFIG_LPAE typos
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:20:44AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 17:02 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
> > it?
>
> That would be only the setup.c chunk. That fixes a typo introduced in
> v3.4 (see commit e5ab85800820edd907d3f43f285e1232f84d5a41
> ("ARM: 7382/1: mm: truncate memory banks to fit in 4GB space for classic
> MMU")). So, if that chunk is deemed appropriate for stable, you could
> consider the v3.4.y longterm tree too.
Even then, I don't think it's worth backporting this patch. membank->start
and membank->size are phys_addr_t, so with LPAE enabled, this check won't
trigger anyway. The #ifndef is just there for readability really (since the
printk message explicitly refers to 32-bit physical addresses).
So I wouldn't bother with this.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists