[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5178F602.9040100@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:23:14 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: mtosatti@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: MMU: init kvm generation close to mmio wrap-around
value
On 04/24/2013 08:59 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:56:49PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Then it has chance to trigger mmio generation number wrap-around
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 8 ++++++++
>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 6 ++++++
>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 6c1e642..4e1f7cb 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>> gfn_t gfn_offset, unsigned long mask);
>> void kvm_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm);
>> +void kvm_arch_init_generation(struct kvm *kvm);
>> void kvm_mmu_invalid_mmio_sptes(struct kvm *kvm);
>> unsigned int kvm_mmu_calculate_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm);
>> void kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int kvm_nr_mmu_pages);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> index d314e21..dcc059c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -4279,6 +4279,14 @@ restart:
>> spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> }
>>
>> +void kvm_arch_init_generation(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>> + /* It is easier to trigger mmio generation-number wrap-around. */
>> + kvm_memslots(kvm)->generation = MMIO_MAX_GEN - 13;
> kvm_memslots(kvm)->generation should never overflow since
> (read|write)_cached mechanism does not handle it. Initialising it to
> anything but 0 makes overflow more likely.
>
> You can hide mmio overflow trick in kvm_current_mmio_generation():
>
> static unsigned int kvm_current_mmio_generation(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return (kvm_memslots(kvm)->generation + MMIO_MAX_GEN - 13) & MMIO_GEN_MASK;
> }
Very smart idea. Thanks you, Gleb!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists