[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130425092930.GI4623@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:29:30 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Calculate number of logical
channels from physical ones
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > This change will cost ~25KB of memory, but it's worth the trade-off,
> > as it removes a great deal of overhead. It means that instead of only
> > allocating memory for the logical channels in use, it does so for all
> > available ones, which is 32 per physical channel. However, this now
> > means we can remove some platform data and we don't have to worry
> > about adding vendor specific variables to Device Tree.
> >
> > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
> > Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>
> > Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> (...)
> > static struct stedma40_platform_data dma40_plat_data = {
> > - .dev_len = DB8500_DMA_NR_DEV,
>
> So that was set to 64 in the platform...
>
> > - /* Count the number of logical channels in use */
> > - for (i = 0; i < plat_data->dev_len; i++)
> > - if (plat_data->dev_rx[i] != 0)
> > - num_log_chans++;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; i < plat_data->dev_len; i++)
> > - if (plat_data->dev_tx[i] != 0)
> > - num_log_chans++;
>
> And I guess this code snippet made it go down to <= 32 all the time,
> correct?
However many were described in dma40_[rx|tx]_map, yes.
> Just want to understand it before I ACK. (The idea is sound.)
>
> I notice there is no check whatsoever of the bounds of
> plat_data->dev_[rx|tx] but that is a different problem I guess...
The array is going away anyway, so we don't need to threat.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists