[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYuV+ZP8nW=PHgiw6KOjM9js9Mwd3-XVXCkH6wq213D0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:12:47 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Remove redundant argument
from d40_phy_cfg()
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> d40_phy_cfg is now only ever called to configure physical channels, so
> there's no requirement to pass though an argument describing the type
> of channel and to subsequently test for it.
>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
> Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>
> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
As mentioned, squash this into the patch where this is made redundant,
no point in first making an argument unused in one patch and then
deleting it in another patch.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists