[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokU6bkHrWN3ZYQs1SRkyjZwM-hZLzxd-4Ea93gYKZ+u7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:45:23 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>,
Steve Bannister <Steve.Bannister@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>, airlied@...hat.com,
mingo@...hat.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/5] workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT
for power oriented workqueues
On 25 April 2013 16:43, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 25 April 2013 09:00, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> Yes. That was my intention - preventing a prompt on existing defconfigs and
>>> there by maintaining current behavior.
>>
>> Hmm... Following is the version after fixing all problems you reported.
>> @Tejun: I have attached it too as gmail's copy-paste may break it. Please
>> consider applying this series if it looks fine to you.
>>
>>
>> ---------------x----------------x---------------------
>>
>> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:45:40 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH V5 1/5] workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for
>> power oriented workqueues
>>
>> Workqueues can be performance or power-oriented. Currently, most workqueues are
>> bound to the CPU they were created on. This gives good performance (due to cache
>> effects) at the cost of potentially waking up otherwise idle cores just to
>> process some work. To save power, we can allow the work to be rescheduled on a
>> core that is already awake.
>>
>> Workqueues created with the WQ_UNBOUND flag will allow some power savings.
>> However, we don't change the default behaviour of the system. To enable
>> power-saving behaviour, a new config option CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT needs to
>> be turned on. This option can also be overridden by the
>> workqueue.power_efficient boot parameter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> For the series, you can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists