[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda0sE+KgdagN0CsRsoDFR+VoUzh2jaipB_1BtShYpBCcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:55:39 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andreas Westin <andreas.westin@...ricsson.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
magnus.p.persson@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] crypto: ux500/hash - Set DMA configuration though dma_slave_config()
Pls include Magnus.p.persson@...ricsson.com on all these crypto/hash
postings.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> The DMA controller currently takes configuration information from
> information passed though dma_channel_request(), but it shouldn't.
> Using the API, the DMA channel should only be configured during
> a dma_slave_config() call.
>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Andreas Westin <andreas.westin@...ricsson.com>
> Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
(...)
> #define HASH_BLOCK_SIZE 64
> +#define HASH_DMA_FIFO 4
This is an address so write 0x0004 here please. Some hex notation atleast.
> /**
> * struct hash_device_data - structure for a hash device.
> - * @base: Pointer to the hardware base address.
> + * @base: Pointer to virtual base address of the hash device.
> + * @phybase: Pointer to physical memory location of the hash device.
> * @list_node: For inclusion in klist.
> * @dev: Pointer to the device dev structure.
> * @ctx_lock: Spinlock for current_ctx.
> @@ -361,6 +363,7 @@ struct hash_req_ctx {
> */
> struct hash_device_data {
> struct hash_register __iomem *base;
> + phys_addr_t phybase;
What you pass to the config function is a dma_addr_t actually.
This is the same thing on the platform, but generally:
phys_addr_t = in the address space as the memory controller sees it.
dma_addr_t = in the address space as the DMA controller sees it.
Often the same. Not always. So use dma_addr_t.
Apart from this a real nice patch!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists