lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbFgW6bGYt59WtN4r2izuN09AJw4J1cqir82uzFsuMmWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:02:11 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andreas Westin <andreas.westin@...ricsson.com>,
	"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	magnus.p.persson@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] crypto: ux500/cryp - Set DMA configuration though dma_slave_config()

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> The DMA controller currently takes configuration information from
> information passed though dma_channel_request(), but it shouldn't.
> Using the API, the DMA channel should only be configured during
> a dma_slave_config() call.
>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Andreas Westin <andreas.westin@...ricsson.com>
> Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

(...)
>  /* Cryp DMA interface */
> +#define HASH_DMA_TX_FIFO       0x08
> +#define HASH_DMA_RX_FIFO       0x10

Yes, this is nice address notation :-)

>  /**
>   * struct cryp_device_data - structure for a cryp device.
> - * @base: Pointer to the hardware base address.
> + * @base: Pointer to virtual base address of the cryp device.
> + * @phybase: Pointer to physical memory location of the cryp device.
>   * @dev: Pointer to the devices dev structure.
>   * @clk: Pointer to the device's clock control.
>   * @pwr_regulator: Pointer to the device's power control.
> @@ -232,6 +236,7 @@ struct cryp_dma {
>   */
>  struct cryp_device_data {
>         struct cryp_register __iomem *base;
> +       phys_addr_t phybase;

Use dma_addr_t. Maybe "phybase" is misleading,
"dmabase" is probably better. (Also applies to the
cryp patch).

Apart from that it looks allright.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ