[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130425131129.GK4623@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:11:29 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/32] ARM: ux500: Supply MMC DMA configuration via
Device Tree
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > When requesting a channel, a DMA client needs to pass some pieces of
> >> > information such as; request channel, device type, channel type and
> >> > direction etc. Normally we do this in the form of platform data, but
> >> > when DT is enabled we need to pass it using the driver's bindings
> >> > instead.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> This requires that the pending MMCI patch get merged *first* right?
> >
> > No, it doesn't. There is no harm in applying this *before*.
> >
> > It will just lay dormant until it is.
>
> Ah yeah, right. But the patch stripping out the platform data (no 31) will
> wreak havoc if applied before the MMCI patch right?
Yes, that will cause problems. It will most likely go into PIO mode.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists