[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5178890E.9090201@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:38:22 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer, add expiry time overflow check in hrtimer_interrupt
On 2013/4/25 6:42, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:34:26PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/08/2013 04:19 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On 04/08/2013 05:47 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> A simple check for an overflow can resolve this problem. Using KTIME_MAX
>>>> instead of the overflow value will result in the hrtimer function being run,
>>>> and the reprogramming of the timer after that.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>>> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Prarit: Should this be tagged for -stable?
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Yes, this should go to -stable. cc'd.
>>
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit surprised that this patch has not found its way into mainline yet,
> as everyone seems to agree that it is a candidate for -stable.
>
> I hit this problem very reliably (ie with each boot) with 3.8.x on systems
> which have no RTC and run systemd. Seen with Freescale P5040 as well as
> a Broadcom MIPS based system.
>
FYI, we also hit this warning with 3.4-rt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists