[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366896232.6139.21.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:23:52 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Tim Sander <tim.sander@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.4.41-rt55-feat1
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 15:09 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when
> > > > PREEMPT_RT_FULL is selected?
> > >
> > > No, why ?
> >
> > Why not? ;-)
> >
> > Except for the lack of support, one would think that if you want real
> > time responses, you would also want a real time clock.
>
> Well, if your application is driven by an external interrupt, then you
> do not need highres timers at all.
(hey, that's cheating, generic config vs specialized;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists