[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51793DE6.3000503@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:29:58 +0400
From: "Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
To: "miklos@...redi.hu" <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC: <dev@...allels.com>, <xemul@...allels.com>,
"fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 14/14] mm: Account for WRITEBACK_TEMP in
balance_dirty_pages
Hi Miklos,
04/01/2013 02:42 PM, Maxim V. Patlasov пишет:
> Make balance_dirty_pages start the throttling when the WRITEBACK_TEMP
> counter is high enough. This prevents us from having too many dirty
> pages on fuse, thus giving the userspace part of it a chance to write
> stuff properly.
>
> Note, that the existing balance logic is per-bdi, i.e. if the fuse
> user task gets stuck in the function this means, that it either
> writes to the mountpoint it serves (but it can deadlock even without
> the writeback) or it is writing to some _other_ dirty bdi and in the
> latter case someone else will free the memory for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@...allels.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 0713bfb..c47bcd4 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -1235,7 +1235,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> */
> nr_reclaimable = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
> global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
> - nr_dirty = nr_reclaimable + global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK);
> + nr_dirty = nr_reclaimable + global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) +
> + global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP);
>
> global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
Please drop this patch. As we discussed in LSF/MM, the fix above is
correct, but it's not enough: we also need to ensure disregard of
NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP when balance_dirty_pages() is called from fuse daemon.
I'll send a separate patch-set soon.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists