lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:28:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@...uxbox.com> To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> Cc: David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>, Dave Chiluk <chiluk@...onical.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bfields@...ldses.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni Hi, Just to clarify, the IBM delay behavior is not legal? Matt ----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote: > > OK, then. Now all I need is actual motivation for changing the > existing > code other than handwaving arguments about "polling is better than > flat > waits". > What actual use cases are impacting us now, other than the AIX design > decision to force CLOSE to retry at least once before succeeding? > -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists