[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5179562C.3000903@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:13:32 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
CC: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS lost on x86 with ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
changes?
On 04/25/2013 12:11 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 24.04.2013 18:07, schrieb John Stultz:
>
>>> And why is RTC_SYSTOHC now gone on x86?
>>
>> So summarizing the above, because as much as I'm aware, its always been
>> redundant and unnecessary on x86. Thus being able at build time to mark
>> it as unnecessary was attractive, since it reduced the code paths
>> running at suspend/resume.
>
> Hmm, I thought RTC_SYSTOHC was there to update the used RTC clock with
> the time from NTP (and liked that). Therefor I don't understand why it
> is redundant and unnecessary on x86. Of course, most systems do have
> something in userspace to set the RTC on shutdown, so it isn't really
> needed.
Prior to SYSTOHC being introduced, we only synced system time to the RTC
via update_persistent_clock() on systems that had that interface.
SYSTOHC is relatively new and lets the system sync to RTCs that don't
have the persistent clock.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists