lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:13:32 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
CC:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS lost on x86 with ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK
 changes?

On 04/25/2013 12:11 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 24.04.2013 18:07, schrieb John Stultz:
>
>>> And why is RTC_SYSTOHC now gone on x86?
>>
>> So summarizing the above, because as much as I'm aware, its always been
>> redundant and unnecessary on x86.  Thus being able at build time to mark
>> it as unnecessary was attractive, since it reduced the code paths
>> running at suspend/resume.
>
> Hmm, I thought RTC_SYSTOHC was there to update the used RTC clock with 
> the time from NTP (and liked that). Therefor I don't understand why it 
> is redundant and unnecessary on x86. Of course, most systems do have 
> something in userspace to set the RTC on shutdown, so it isn't really 
> needed.

Prior to SYSTOHC being introduced, we only synced system time to the RTC 
via update_persistent_clock() on systems that had that interface. 
SYSTOHC is relatively new and lets the system sync to RTCs that don't 
have the persistent clock.

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ